The Hegelian Dialectic, an unsophisticated concept that is the pining thorn in the side of world liberty, the often utilized pathway that a world government almost certainly follows to implement changes without approval. Putting two contrasting things together mediates a synthesis result, Ordo Ab Chao or Order out of Chaos is a freemasonic principle that is strongly associated with the Hegelian Dialectic, the end justifies the means. This article will aim to explain the fundamental concept in world government conspiracy.
“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by consent or conquest.”
–James Paul Warburg [son of Paul Warburg, the author of the Federal Reserve Act] February 7, 1950
Here’s the formula: A (thesis) versus B (anti-thesis) equals C (synthesis).
For example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.
Here’s a video explaining it: The Video
Agenda: what does the world government want to achieve? Centralization of their power, increasing their overlord stature without doing so through open tyranny, Nazi Germany proves that this will never work. Instead, doing so behind the scenes until the point of no return while dumbing down the unaware populace from birth, does the trick.
The Hegelian Dialectic gives a very subliminal approach, the vast majority of average joes would never expect it.
“We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
—John Swinton, chief-of-staff, New York Times, NY Press Club 1880
Thesis: Manufacturing the “Threat” – the ‘permissible’ reason for effectively tyrannical change that looks innocent and justified. In the modern age, terrorism has been widely diesseminated as the common enemy of the world, with staged events and groups such as 9/11 2001 (Look into it if you disagree), 7/7 2005, Charlie Hebdo in 2015, ISIS/ISIL, and various others, the threat of manufactured terrorism is seen by the average person through the eyes of the MSM (Mainstream Media) – something to be fought and subdued.
“Look like the innocent flower,
But be the serpent under it.”
If terrorists strike the home ground, cognitive dissonance and the stockholm syndrome; aka, our psychological tendency to follow our governmental masters as secondary parents and shepherds kicks in. Don’t tell me you never followed your parents/guardians bidding.
We often are too absorbed in our personal lives to invest our mental strength towards foreign policy – the illusion of the UN makes us think that multiple independent countries are all taking part and having their exclusive say in the matters. The reality is singular control.
We are walled in by our own weakness towards recreational activities;
[Neo tries a drink made by Dozer and winces.]
Cypher: Good shit, huh? It’s good for two things: degreasing engines and killing brain cells.
Nearly all of us fall at this second stage because too many of us have been conditioned from birth to accept the guidance of our authoritarian superiors. People who speak in alternative lights are shunned and branded political heretics, it is a vicious cycle that has repeated itself many a time in history, remember religious heretics and the renaissance? We were trapped in a dark age for over a millenium.
Antithesis: This is the point of reconfiguration relative to the Thesis. If there is a terrorist state for example, the government stakes the lives of innocents as the point of action, overriding the lesser voices of the protesting and making direct involvement with a barely consensual population who know no better, due to conditioned exposure to the events – and not realizing the reality of a fabricated Terrorist threat.
As a result we get the Synthesis: A removal of freedoms, for example clamping down on immigration policies, heightened state security, increased gun control – taking away our weapons to defend ourselves, this prevents deadly riots and violent opposition.
All for the sake of an artificial threat.
thuleanindependent.wordpress.com 