Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell Are Just The Tip of The Iceberg: This Goes Much Deeper

From Collective Evolution.

What Happened: Jeffrey Epstein’s confidant, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been arrested and charged with conspiracy to persuade minors to travel and engage in sex acts as well as enticing and transporting a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts. Many of Epstein’s victims have mentioned Maxwell a number of times as Epstein’s right hand person. They have also stated that Maxwell has been involved in these sexual acts with minors along with Epstein.

She, as well as Epstein, attracted young girls by promising them money, fame, careers and more. In some cases they became very close with their victims, which has been seen as a form of brainwashing that has resulted in extreme trauma for many of their victims.

According to the BBC, Maxwell “assisted, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom and ultimately abuse victims known to Maxwell and Epstein to be under the age of 18”.

How Deep This Really Goes: Epstein’s case goes beyond just the dealings involving Maxwell and himself, and the issue of trafficking very young children, and teenaged children, is much more widespread than Epstein. Epstein is being made out to simply be a rich billionaire with connections that allowed him to entice young women into his home to be sexually abused, but we really need to talk about just how widespread this type of abuse is among people who are made out to be idols, like multiple Vatican officials, politicians and celebrities.

There is reason to believe that Epstein’s his job was actually to entice powerful people within politics to have sex with young women and then ultimately entrap them, whether it’s with photographs or hidden cameras or through other methods. For example, in an interview with Zev Shalev, former CBS News executive producer and award-winning investigative journalist for Narativ, the former senior executive for Israel’s Directorate of Military Intelligence, Ari Ben-Menashe, claimed not only to have met Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged madame Ghislaine Maxwell, back in the 1980s, but that both Epstein and Maxwell were already working with Israeli intelligence during that time period.

Alan Dershowitz in a recent article he wrote for Spectator USA stated that he was introduced to Maxwell through a prominent couple of the powerful Jewish Rothschild banking dynasty:

“My wife and I were introduced to Ghislaine Maxwell by Sir Evelyn and Lady Lynne de Rothschild, and we subsequently met her on several occasions — generally in the presence of prominent people such as Bill and Hillary Clinton, Nobel Prize-winning scientists, presidents of universities, and prominent academic and business people.”

Alan Dershowitz (The Ghislaine Maxwell I know, Spectator USA, July 3, 2020)

There are multiple allegations that Epstein was not only a pedophile involved in the trafficking of children, but actually an intelligence agent as well. This isn’t the only time “Defense” organizations have been implicated in this type of activity. In the recent past, multiple military personnel have been arrested, hundreds of Pentagon employees were found to be involved with child porn.

It’s also important to acknowledge that this isn’t the only example. Another great example would be the  NXIVM case, where multiple members were implicated in some shady activity. Billionaire Clare Bronfman was indicted on racketeering charges. These charges were connected to her role as “Operations Director” for NXIVM. Clare Bronfman is the daughter of Charles Bronfman, a Canadian/American businessman and philanthropist. A very powerful person.

Just like with the Epstein case, the Clinton’s are mentioned with regards to NXIVM as well.

The Rolling Stone reported:

“There are strange political connections as well. Mark Vicente, a documentary filmmaker and former high-ranking member of the group, testified at the trial of NXIVM head Keith Raniere that Clare Bronfman, the billionaire Seagram’s heiress and alleged benefactor of the organization, approached him and a few other members of the group to help her make a contribution to a Clinton campaign.” (source)

This kind of stuff is all over the place, and the theme involves high ranking people. As a paper published in European Psychiatry details:

Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment’ members. Former state senator John W DeCamp, cited as one of the most effective legislators in Nebraska history, is today attorney for two of the abuse victims. A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ritual murder’ of a new born girl, a small boy (who was subsequently fried and eaten) and three others.

There are many more examples that implicate the Royal Families of multiple countries, and many other shocking examples of elite level pedophile rings.

If you want to dive in a bit deeper into more research, I published an article a few months ago that goes a lot deeper.

To go down the rabbit hole even deeper on this, we have conducted an interview with a survivor of elite child sex trafficking/slavery. You can access the full interview and start your free trial HERE on CETV, a platform we created to help combat internet censorship and allow us to continue to do our work and get the word out about various issues and topics.

The Takeaway

There is so much evidence showing that the global financial elite (various members of upper tier politics, corporations, Hollywood, Royal Families, and people in positions of great power, the Vatican, etc.) are engaged in such behaviour, and quite a significant amount of them. This article doesn’t even represent the tip of the iceberg and the countless amounts of examples that are out there. This activity has been able to sustain itself because of the power people involved hold.

We are talking about people who have not only experienced a tremendous amount of trauma themselves most likely. So we have to ask ourselves, are you really surprised that our world economic and political systems are plagued with corruption? If these powerful people wanted to, they could come together, pool their resources and help the citizenry create a human experience where everybody thrives. Yet instead, we have a different experience, why? Why is their desire abuse and control? Why do we do the same in our individual lives at times?

Why do we keep participating?

If you watch our interview with Anneke Lucas, you will see how there is a very expansive and uplifting message that comes out of all of this, despite the disheartening subject matter. Human trafficking and child abuse represent the most untold stories of our generation, as they affect hundreds of thousands of people every year, many of them children. We are slowly coming to terms with the fact that this happens at elite levels, done by some of the most ‘prominent’ and powerful people. It’s time to talk about it, and it’s time to ask more questions. Let’s keep disclosure coming and continue to ask ourselves why were hand over our thoughts and power to people who are lacking morality, empathy, and have no desire to see the human race thrive.

Watch Anneke Lucas’ full testimony here on CETV.

You can also watch a recent documentary called Out of Shadows that explores this topic in detail on CETV as well.

The Kardeshev Scale & The Great Filter: Reaching a Type Three Global Civilization

The Kardashev scale is a method of measuring a civilization’s level of technological advancement based on the amount of energy they are able to use. The measure was proposed by Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev in 1964. The scale has three designated categories:

  1. A Type I civilization, also called a planetary civilization—can use and store all of the energy available on its planet.
  2. A Type II civilization, also called a stellar civilization—can use and control energy at the scale of its planetary system.
  3. A Type III civilization, also called a galactic civilization—can control energy at the scale of its entire host galaxy.
Earth: approaching a cohesive type I civilization. Advances in nuclear fusion and fission revolutionized the harnessing of energy in the modern era.

According to the theoretical physicist Michio Kaku, the next 100 years of science will determine whether we collapse or prevail. Will we remain a cyclical Type 0 civilization – or will we advance and make our way into the stars, by developing interstellar technology? Is a pivot to globalism necessary?

While humans evolve within complex co-evolving organizational, cultural, memetic, and genetic systems, all of these systems show long-term tendencies to make use of reproductively-useful resources. Can we shift our perception of resources?

World efforts in Science are taking shape as we move into the 21st century, we are shifting our fundamental social perception from the national to the international, and eventually – the interstellar:

European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) (Since 1954):

“The clever people at CERN are smashing particles together in the hope that Doctor Who will turn up and tell them to stop.”

Ben Aaronovitch, Moon Over Soho

Established in 1954, Switzerland’s international CERN is the world leader in particle physics. Its aim is “to provide a unique range of particle accelerator facilities that enable research at the forefront of human knowledge,” to “perform world-class research in fundamental physics”, and to “unite people from all over the world to push the frontiers of science and technology, for the benefit of all.”

In developing a more total understanding of metaphysics and the essential fabric of spacetime and the building blocks of matter itself, we can move closer to technological breakthroughs that could revolutionize mankind’s future. CERN aims to do just that.

CERN also happens to be the 1990 birthplace of the world wide web, invented by Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee.

The Human Genome Project (Since 1990):

“Without a doubt, this is the most important, most wondrous map ever produced by human kind.”

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton commenting on the of the Human Genome Project.

Established in 1990, and primarily undertaken by 6 countries – the United States, China, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, and France, the human genome project has significantly changed our understanding of human genetics. It successfully mapped the entire human genome, something unthinkable not long ago. To put this into perspective, the human genome contains 3 billion letters. The understanding gained from this project is leading to the development of highly efficient, personalized treatments for a multitude of genetic disorders such as schizophrenia, diabetes, and heart disease. As scientists internationally continue to use and study the data provided by the human genome project, we can be sure to expect some amazing discoveries in the future.

The International Vaccine Institute (Since 1997):

“Vaccines must be made available globally. The benefits are manifold, from the broader benefit to global public health, the creation of innovation and technical capacity at home and issues around national bio-defense ― central to these is the idea that vaccines keep healthy people healthy.”

Jerome H. Kim, Director General of the International Vaccine Institute.

The International Vaccine Institute (IVI) has been working hard for the past 20 years to create vaccines for infectious diseases plaguing developing countries. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, it is the only organization in the world dedicated to creating vaccines for developing countries. The institute’s staff include scientists and medical practitioners from Germany, the US, South Korea, Colombia, Kenya, Bangladesh, India, Canada, and other countries making it a truly international endeavor. Their work has led to the development of vaccines and medicines for cholera, typhoid, and other illnesses. What makes the IVI so special isn’t that it just develops vaccines for the developing world, they also deliver them! What’s even more awesome about this international effort? The IVI works to ensure that each of its vaccines can be affordably and sustainably produced within developing countries, increasing their accessibility as well as their impact.  

A darker side of this institution could be the use of vaccines to beneficially control the global population. Something understandably glossed over by its publicists.

Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) (Since 2015):

Scientists at DUNE hope to revolutionize our understanding of the role neutrinos play in the creation of the universe.

  • A comprehensive investigation of neutrino oscillations to test CP violation in the lepton sector.
  • Determination the ordering of the neutrino masses.
  • Search for neutrinos beyond the currently known three.
  • Studies of supernovae and the formation of a neutron star or black hole.
  • Search for proton decay.

Among other initiatives, both public and classified.

The Great Filter:

The term “Great Filter” (GF) was pioneered by Robin Hanson, an associate professor of economics at George Mason University and a research associate at the Future of Humanity Institute of Oxford University. The term was coined in his 1998 paper “The Great Filter – Are We Almost Past It?”. The GF is the disturbing suggestion that there is some kind of absurdly difficult step in the evolution of life — one that precludes it from becoming interstellar. And is the reason that there are no observable type 3 or 4 civilizations, despite 13.8 billion year of history for such a development to occur in the known universe. Alternatively, such an advanced civilization may exist, but the sheer expanse of the universe is physically impossible to colonize, so such a civilization may be very localized.

The GF term simply refers to the most major step that prevents a civilization reaching ultimate fruition, for example the Chicxulub impactor meteor that struck earth and wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago is a filter, but may (or may not) be the deciding GF.

“No alien civilizations have substantially colonized our solar system or systems nearby. Thus among the billion trillion stars in our past universe, none has reached the level of technology and growth that we may soon reach. This one data point implies that a Great Filter stands between ordinary dead matter and advanced exploding lasting life. And the big question is: How far along this filter are we?”

Robin Hanson (The Great Filter – Are We Almost Past It?, 1998)
A graphic representation of the Chicxulub impactor.

In order to transcend a sub type one civilization, mankind must find a way to end the cycle of civilization (historic rise and fall) and surpass the numerous filters, by chance or concerted action – one of those major filters is mankind itself; our own innate flaws as a collective species. From the abiogenesis of ‘dead matter’ right through to expanding & lasting sentient life, optimally merged with biotechnology and self-designed hive-mind qualities.

The greatest of all supposed filters would be the heat death of the universe, which no organic life may survive, in theory. Although this hypothesis has seen criticism, Hans Adolf Buchdahl wrote of the theory as “the entirely unjustifiable assumption that the universe can be treated as a closed thermodynamic system”.

Another such filter would be when the Sun has entered the red giant phase, about 5 billion years from now – thus engulfing the Earth. By which time, if humanity had not been made extinct by other major threats such as meteorite impact events, we would need to have developed interstellar technology to depart our (by then, highly aged) solar system and find another habitable planet, many light-years away. The current main candidate being Alpha Centauri, Earth’s nearest Sun-like star system, which is 4.37 light-years away. Luckily, it is thought that by 2200 AD mankind will have successfully developed interstellar technology, according to a MIT technology review.

“Technically, such space colonization seems feasible, even if it is well beyond our current abilities, since even now we can envision the enabling technologies. Slow self-sufficient interstellar boats would be nearly feasible now, if we were rich enough to construct them. And fast less-than-kilogram-sized [Forward 85,87] self-reproducing [Tipler 80] nanotech-based [Drexler 92b] space-traveling machine intelligences (artificial or uploaded [Hanson 94]) seem possible within a few centuries.”

“There are no obvious limits to spacecraft speed (other than lightspeed), given sufficient resources. And with full (nanotech-based) control over the atomic structure of matter [Drexler 92a], colonists should mainly be interested in the atoms and negentroy they can extract from a colonization site [Dyson 66,79], and the convenience of its location.”

Robin Hanson (The Great Filter – Are We Almost Past It?, 1998)

Meteorite impact events: In April 2018, the B612 Foundation reported “It’s 100 per cent certain we’ll be hit (by a devastating asteroid), but we’re not 100 per cent certain when.” In 2018, physicist Stephen Hawking, in his final book Brief Answers to the Big Questions, considered an asteroid collision to be the biggest threat to the planet. The odds of a 5-10 kilometre wide asteroid, the likes of which made the dinosaurs go extinct, hitting Earth is almost negligible at 0.000001%. Although drawn out over 5 billion years, the chance of such an impact becomes much more probable.

Man-made ecological collapse: Another major filter (and one we have the most control over) is mankind’s propensity to recklessly overpopulate and in-fight. Sensibly managing new advances in human technology and capacity for resource consumption and utilization will be key in preventing exhaustion of the Earth’s finite resources, and avoiding a total ecological collapse that could plunge humanity back into the dark ages – or cause a mass extinction event.

Gamma ray bursts: Another filter is the danger of Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). These are extremely energetic explosions that have been observed in distant galaxies and pose a significant risk to life in a habitable ecosystem within effective range. The intense radiation of most observed GRBs is thought to be released during a supernova or superluminous supernova as a high-mass star implodes to form a neutron star or a black hole. The major Ordovician–Silurian extinction events 450 million years ago may have been caused by a GRB.

Nuclear war: The threat of nuclear war on earth is another filter to be considered. The direct impact of nuclear warheads wouldn’t be the sole cause of a mass die-off through using nuclear weapons, the ensuing nuclear winter (caused by soot injected into the stratosphere, causing global cooling) will be the likely deadly aftermath. Complete human extinction by nuclear weapons is rated at 1% chance for this century.

Extraterrestrial threat to human life: Accounting for the Fermi paradox – which describes the apparent contradiction between the lack of evidence for extraterrestrial civilizations and various high estimates for their probability (such as some optimistic estimates for the Drake equation). The general consensus, if you discard the rare earth hypothesis, is that the universe probably does sustain a great number of extraterrestrial life, and possibly even advanced alien civilization with interstellar travel. The threat then, is elevated if this life is likely to, or already has come into contact with human life, and is watching “from the shadows”, and has a propensity to destroy if you accept the hypothesis that highly intelligent life either destroys itself, or everything else.

What hypothetical qualities will we require to pass the great filter to reach a type 3 civilization?

  1. A Globalist world state, a new flag representing Earth as one nation, establishment of worldwide futurist architecture and a singular planetary identity.
  2. Abolition of private and personal property, total commitment of resources to interstellar ambitions and furtherance of communal human accomplishment.
  3. Transhumanism & a biotech revolution. Abolition of binary gender to preprogram transhumanism and neurotechnology.
  4. A single global race of humans, eradication of our differences and schisms, Marxism to undermine national separateness; evolution to “Homo deus”.
  5. Total reduction of corruption and human-caused conflict via hyper interconnected technocracy.
  6. Secular humanism mixed with Scientism as the new unifying world religion.
  7. Use of climate scare psyops such as “Global warming” to prompt countries into alignment with globalist initiatives and shift public perception.

“Similarly, human control over genetics will change the way variation is encoded, and greatly speed up the variation process, but will by itself not let humans escape the basic evolutionary process of variation and selection. Avoiding this process would require global control over reproduction, implying at least a strong world government regulating child-bearing, local economic growth, and even the spread of ideas, with a political process undemocratic enough to avoid variation and selection working through the political process.”

Robin Hanson (The Great Filter – Are We Almost Past It?, 1998)
Centered in the flag, seven rings form a flower – a symbol of the life on Earth. The rings are linked to each other, which represents how everything on our planet, directly or indirectly, are linked. The blue field represents water which is essential for life – also as the oceans cover most of our planet’s surface. The flower’s outer rings form a circle which could be seen as a symbol of Earth as a planet and the blue surface could represent the universe.

A new world order may require rethinking the old world order.

Here are some budding futurist concepts:

The Red Pill Constitution

From Illimitable Men.

1.) Preface
2.) Feminism, Power & Privilege
3.) Women, Logic & Emotional Reasoning
4.) Woman’s Manipulative Nature
5.) Self-Limiting Genetic Determinism
6.) Hypergamy & Branch Swinging
7.) The 80/20 Rule
8.) The Hierarchy of Love
9.) Frame & Emotional Indulgence
10.) Female Visceral Revulsion
11.) Dominance & Boldness
12.) In-Group Bias & The Women Are Wonderful Effect
13.) Female Sexual Plurality
14.) Low Tier Men
14.) Gynocentric Family Law
15.) Female Narcissism
17.) Commitment Is More Valuable Than Sex
18.) Gatekeeping
19.) The Wall: Men Appreciate, Women Depreciate
20.) Men Are Made, Women Are Born
21.) Single Mothers Breed Weak Men
22.) The Importance of Social Market Value
23.) Testosterone & Health
24.) The Feminisation of Education
25.) Why Women Covet Male Friendship

1.) Preface:

The following document embodies a series of principles that outline the tenets and beliefs of the red pill community. This article has been written with brevity and ease of reading in mind, links relevant to further discussion are given for each topic where available. The information herein is extensive, but by no means exhaustive. I hope to evolve this document year-on-year, adding additional depth and topic areas.

2.) Feminism, Pity, Power & Privilege:

Feminists crave privileges which consolidate the realm of male power with that of the female. Typically they are traditionalist in ways which benefit women (men pay for dates, pressure to perform is squarely on men) but “progressive” where traditionalism would limit their power (intolerance for female promiscuity, a reluctance to trust women with leadership.)

This is achieved by glossing over the influence of feminine soft power in society (influence and charm), and comparing men and women solely in hard power (economic and political). In taking this highly one-sided approach to power, feminists play upon humanity’s propensity to take pity on women, and where the myth of female powerlessness is bought into, more power is redistributed to them.

Feminism is nothing more than a female supremacy movement posing as one of humanist egalitarianism. Feminism highlights female incompetence in areas where men excel, redefines them as injustices by blaming men for female ineptitude, and then legally mandates the promotion of women within said areas. As such, women consistently make social gains in areas where men have traditionally dominated.

All the while women continue to quietly monopolise soft power. Because social influence (the female monopoly on pity as well as beauty) is difficult to quantify, its prominence is neither stated nor factored into measures of equality. And in case you think that ridiculous, feminists factor in things as benign as the economic value of housework, so not to do the same with female beauty or vulnerability is highly disingenuous if your goal is to economically quantify elements relevant to social equality.

Where the reverse occurred, where men monopolised hard power, we experienced 50~ years of social engineering to correct for the fact. The ability to be respected in spite of glaring vulnerability is a staggering albeit scarcely spoken of social advantage women enjoy, yet it is the pivotal psychological fulcrum on which feminism owes its modern ideological dominance.

Where the pendulum has swung much too far in favour of women, a successful male counter movement has failed to materialise. Not solely because, but chiefly because pity is in short supply for men. A man seeking pity is despised for his weakness rather than helped because of it, and so the very psychological mechanism which gave birth to female economic and political power is nought but a dead end for men.

3.) Women, Logic & Emotional Reasoning:

Women are irrational and inconsistent, they have a capacity for logic but they are not typically inclined to utilise it.Women must exert concentrated effort to be logical for it is not their factory setting, men on the other hand although imperfect have a far more pronounced affinity for logic. As such by matter of preference if not biology, men are near universally superior logicians and decision makers.

A logical woman is easily baited into becoming emotional. Regardless of intellect, women are far more likely to lose lucidity due to a stronger preference for emotive reasoning. It is by extension of this that we observe women to be more easily compromised in a line of reasoning than men. A woman’s decisions are based on her current emotional state, not logic. Once overwhelmed by the feeling of the moment and riding on a tidal wave of emotion, even if an awareness of what is fair and rational remains intact in a woman, she shall opt to ignore it in favour of indulging “what feels right.”

Ever witness a woman hear something reasonable, and in the indignation of her emotion declare “I don’t care!” before muttering something that makes no sense to anybody but her? This is a prime example of solipsism, the female propensity to “reason” with an inner emotional narrative that is all but impervious to outside influence. As such, women often behave erratically and in contradiction. Women are fickle, so a wise man watches how they behave and disregards what they say.

4.) Woman’s Manipulative Nature:

Women are Machiavellian by nature. In comparison to the average man, they are far more proficient in matters of persuasion andgeneral social manipulation. The theoretical evolutionary basis for this sex difference is that due to smaller body mass and inferior musculature, women evolved to attract and use men as tools rather than directly compete with them.

This makes the pronunciation of female strength a propensity to be mentally rather than physically violent. Physical violence is outlawed, whereas mental abuse is not, with a suppression of physical violence without an equal suppression of mental, women are at a social advantage.

The intolerance for physical violence coupled with the tolerance for mental violence is what allows women to bully and socially dominate without being held accountable by a system of law. Men are as such forced to learn to become as apt in mental violence as women, or face social disadvantage.

The law does not criminalise emotional violence against men. Where physical violence is illegal (but typically more so if it is male on female rather than female on male), emotional violence is a question of personal morality and therefore not legislated against. Where a man’s instinct is to hit, a woman’s is to make you miserable. Arguably, mental wounds can be just as crippling if not more so than physical. In summation, women tend to be more emotionally aggressive than men.

5.) Self-Limiting Genetic Determinism:

Your race/ethnicity does not matter if you are rich and/or successful. A lot of men are small-minded and stuck on the superficial, White, Black, Arab, Indian, Asian whatever, you have a certain perception of the world based upon the culture that dominates your racial/tribal background.

Non-whites in western countries are very conscious of their ethnic identity, and oft it is so that non-white men feel shame or anger over their lack of whiteness. Asians in particular, seem to glorify whiteness and perpetuate a culture of racial self-hatred. This “but I’ll never have it good because I’m not white” is a form of mental disease, an unproductive self-limiting belief that will hold you back and make you insecure.

Perhaps where you live the white man is a god, but know all racial barriers are overcome by power, for money is power. If you’re a 5’0 Asian with a little dick that girls laugh at, a big bank balance and confident attitude will offset that. You won’t get there being jealous/bitter towards whites and putting yourself down, internalised inferiority has to be quashed.

Focus less on racial self-deprecation, more on achievement. Men are judged predominantly on their station in life, a successful man is liked, an unsuccessful man isn’t. Racial insecurity will only hinder your chances at success by polluting your mindset, as such it must be banished by any means necessary. Be proud of your lineage, for you are powerless to change it.

6.) Hypergamy & Branch Swinging:

Female hypergamy is very binary in its approach to men, a man is either deemed superior, or inferior. If a woman believes a man inferior to her, he’s sexually invisible, only when a woman deems a man superior does he become visible.

Women want men who demonstrably exude power in a way that makes them feel inferior. When a woman feels inferior to a man, she is attracted to him. We call this hypergamy, a proclivity to date up and/or social climb. As an affectation of hypergamy, women are highly sensitive to signifiers of high status (good genes, wealth, confidence, popularity etc.)

Hypergamy can manifest in many ways, the best known is gold digging, dating a man solely because of his greater wealth. In less exploitative relationships, a woman dates a man who is more confident than she is. Generally, women low in confidence are less hypergamous, whilst egotistical women are more so.

Hypergamy breeds opportunism, if a man with higher status is sexually available, a woman with unchecked hypergamy will cheat. If he’s available for commitment, there’s a strong possibility she will abandon her man to pair off with the better option. This phenomenon is referred to as “branch swinging.”

Hypergamy not kept in check by a conservative upbringing and strong male family presence results in extremely opportunistic and disloyal women. In traditional societies, hypergamy is kept in check by the family, community and wider culture. Women are paired off with their male contemporaries rather than left to perpetually “wait for something better to come along.”

Some women are more hypergamous than others, but no woman is non-hypergamous. Think of it as a scale, some women are a little hypergamous, others extremely so. Hypergamy is like Pandora’s box, once it is indulged the tendency to continue indulging it is compelling. The more experienced a woman is, the more her hypergamy grows and the less her relational desirability.

Women that make the best candidates for family and childrearing are those whose hypergamous instinct has been kept in check. Materialism and promiscuity are hypergamous behaviours, they’re indicative of a “constant need to upgrade,” which is hypergamy at its core. These kinds of women should be avoided for serious commitments, frugal, humble women make for the best relationship prospects.

7.) The 80/20 Rule:

The 80/20 rule recognises that in a society of rampant hypergamy roughly 20% of the men are fucking 80% of the women. The 80/20 rule is simply “the pareto principle” applied to the realm of sexual strategy. Only in conservative pro-monogamy societies is each man guaranteed a wife within his relative social league. The 80/20 split is the natural order when family values break down and the rise of decadence takes hold.
8.) The Hierarchy of Love:

Love is predicated on the satiation of feminine hypergamy. If a woman thinks she is better than you, she can’t respect you. And if she can’t respect you, she can’t love you.

Women love differently from men. Woman’s love is based on adoration, adoration is a combination of admiration and respect, respect is derived from power. Thus it follows that you must be powerful if you want to be loved, or you will never be loved. You will be held in contempt for being weak. And as per hypergamy, should you be deemed weaker

Women love pragmatically, they lack a capacity to love unconditionally for romantic partners, this is reserved for their children. This behaviour is governed by an effect known as Briffault’s Law. Antithetically, men can love women unconditionally by merit of significant personal investment. There is a hierarchy of love: Men > Women > Children.

Women are more selfish than men are in matters of money and love. Man’s love is expected to be sacrificial in nature, woman’s isn’t. Women love opportunistically, men love sacrificially.

[Read more on this topic here.] [and here.]

9.) Frame & Emotional Indulgence:

Because women are prone to bouts of excessive emotionalism, they rely on men to be more emotionally resilient than they are. This is the need for a man to be steadfast under pressure, stoic, sometimes we refer to this as “holding frame.” As women are typically more indulgent of their emotional whims than are men, they implicitly look toward men as a stabilising force.

In this capacity a man often acts as a means for a woman to process her emotions, a kind of pressure valve or “rock in the storm”; one who endures a woman’s oft excessive or otherwise disproportionate emotional reactions whilst remaining unaffected himself. Women’s emotionalism makes them cathartic in character, possessing a ceaseless need to disencumber themselves of mental distress.

The reverse is naturally inadvisable and ill met, a man who confides his weaknesses in a woman all but signs his own death sentence. Women require either aggressive action to reassure them, or stoic unwavering to calm them. Because of this, men experiencing their own emotional distress elicit fear and disgust more than they do sympathy in women. This is particularly true of a woman accustomed to relying on the man that is hurting. And so to complain to a woman, no matter how earnestly nor passionately, is for a man to engage in an exercise of most profuse folly.

Truly then it stands to reason that the indulgence and open sharing of emotion is a strictly feminine privilege, one that a man cannot engage in no matter how much he desires should he wish to remain respectable to the object of his affection.

When a woman realises a man is mentally strong enough to shoulder her problems on top of his own, she will find this attractive. Women want men who can handle the problems that they can’t.

There is a double standard, if you lean on a woman then the relationship begin falling apart, a woman is ill-equipped to deal with her own problems, let alone a man’s – this is precisely the reason women covet mental toughness in men.

This difference in emotional stability that is so intricately tied into the attraction mechanism explains why women are free to be emotionally indulgent to a point of selfishness, whilst men are comparatively restricted in the range of emotion they can express without weaving the thread of their own undoing.

If both parties are to indulge their emotions, there is no stability and thus no sustainable relationship. As women find it far more difficult to be logical than men, the burden falls to men to suck it up and be the reasonable and stoic ones. Even where men falter in this endeavour, they at least attempt it. It’s not fair, but it’s what works.

10.) Female Visceral Revulsion:

Continuing from the last point, the feminine disgust for male weakness is a function of hypergamy. Women have little sympathy for weak men, despite the fairer sex nonsense you may be accustomed to hearing, it is strong men that are the backbone of any prosperous functioning society.

A man is far more likely than a woman to assist a man in emotional peril, for a man’s reaction to male weakness is not as pronounced as a woman’s. Men do despise effeminate men, but this is not the same as being disgusted by even minor indications of vulnerability. To be strong does not necessarily mean to be emotionally impervious, if there is anyone who will support a man through his darkest moments, it will in all likelihood be another man.

Women feel revulsion when observing male weakness and exploited when a man depends on them. Unlike men women have no provider instinct, they are all too willing to rely, but greatly hesitant to be relied upon.

11.) Dominance & Boldness:

Always set boundaries with everyone, do not be a pushover. Cultivate a sense of fearless boldness. Men take more risks than women and are expected to do so by merit of being male.

Being fearful, unconfident and risk averse as a man leads to failure and disrespect from peers. Men must be confrontational and risk-taking when a situation calls for it, they cannot be passive or defer responsibility without losing esteem. As such, men must are required to problem solve and deal with conflict in a way unexpected of women. Convenient, as men are better equipped to deal with such matters anyhow (see sections 3 and 9).

[Read more on this topic.]

12.) In-Group Bias & The Women Are Wonderful Effect:

Women have a pronounced gender group bias, meaning they typically automatically side with other women in conflict regardless of the situation’s material facts. Women are herdlike and stick together closely, they form cartels and use the power of the group to hen peck and destroy their enemies.

[Relevant study:]

13.) Female Sexual Plurality:

Women have a sexual plurality, if you are a nice guy with money, you are husband material. You get to sex her only after excessive wining and dining. You don’t create a spark of attraction, but she’s looking for safety and security and so she decides “he’ll do.”

On the other hand if you’re a man who sets out to assert rather than impress, you’re the man who gets to nail her within very little time at all. You “create a spark,” you give her butterflies, you’re the lustful lover and not the perfunctory provider, the alpha fucks, not the beta bucks.

14.) Low Tier Men:

Neither women nor society care about male weakness. As alluded to in section 6, low tier men are invisible to women as a function of hypergamy.

If you are weak, depressed, small, poor, uneducated, unconfident, or anything else that prevents you from being powerful, nobody will care about whether you live or die.

People only care about you when you’re powerful, or a woman. You have to pull yourself up by the bootstraps and become self-reliant because nobody else gives a fuck. You’re given a dichotomy, sink or swim, you sink, and you end up drowning yourself in failure and self-pity. If you swim and only if you swim, people will start taking notice.

Society will always have a safety net for women, for weakness is a function of femininity rather than a bug. White knights will come to the rescue, the state will provide welfare and other women are more than happy to side with her – all of this in spite of any success or remarkable accolades! A man of equal unworth is condemned, and rightly so. Whilst women can cruise without social ostracisation, men cannot. Fair it is not, but true it is all the same.

15.) Gynocentric Family Law:

In matters of law the courts always side with women. The law prioritises female well-being over logic, honour and justice. Family law is as such corrupt, contemporarily ruled in its decision-making by feminist dogma.

The constitutions equitable maxims have been rewritten by modern statutes which discriminate most violently against the rights of men per common law, Rollo Tomassi of Rational Male penned a relevant article on this topic, which can be found here.

16.) Female Narcissism:

The stereotypical modern western woman is a self-entitled brat jumped up on feminist hogwash and social media attention. Hypergamy is exacerbated to a point of narcissism, inspiring average women to assume themselves special regardless of their objective lack of worth. It is the ideology they swallow and the bubble of attention they seem to effortlessly maintain which fortifies this most profound narcissism.

Indeed much the problem with contemporary female narcissism is the sheer gynocentrism of the culture we live in, our cultural values are feminine values. Of course cultural values bear much the blame, but they do not shoulder it all.

Much of modern women’s narcissism has its root within the ever growing legions of single mothers, romantically unsuccessful women who raise their daughters in such a man hating manner that their daughters can only view men negatively, each romantic mishap in the daughter’s life reaffirming the vitriolic narrative taught by her mother.

Whether feminist-identifying or not, the values of feminism are the values of most modern women. The self-empowerment message and casual demonisation of the masculine runs deep.

Women are taught by culture and mother alike that they are the prize, that they as women are inherently good, much unlike the evil of men, who can never hope to repent for past grievances “their kind” inflicted upon women.

As such, women need not bother to impress, for women are beyond proving themselves, much unlike men, who cannot ever hope to impress nor prove themselves enough. And it is this degree of conceit coursing through the veins of western society which lies at the heart of not only the feminist ideology, but likewise the modern woman herself. Men are most questionable, women but unquestionable.

17.) Commitment Is More Valuable Than Sex:

Women need men more than men need women, and women hate this. Men want sex and at some point, a family. Women however seek masculine energy to stabilise their impulsivity, coveting paternal dominance and the sense of safety and stability that stoic rationalism lends. (See section 9.)

Just look at single mother households and older single women, they are miserable. Such women need a man to achieve even a semblance of happiness, but men often find these women to be the cause of nothing but misery. The words bachelor and spinster have opposing connotations for a reason, a man’s commitment is his prime commodity.

18.) Gatekeeping:

Men are the gatekeepers of commitment and women are the gatekeepers of sex. Women decide if sex will happen, but men decide if a relationship follows. Why is it this way? Simple supply and demand. Men covet sex more than women, whereas women covet relationships more than men. Male commitment to women is as valuable as sex is to men.

The kicker is, a woman need not necessarily trade sex for commitment. This is the implied contract, and mutually respectable arrangements are where women demand commitment for their sex, and men demand sex for their commitment. However, much like men who enjoy sex devoid commitment, women are known to enjoy commitment devoid sex.

Where a woman can get commitment without giving sex, she shall “become friends” with a man. This is the friend zone, a purgatory where men willing to commit to a woman without any promise of sex from her in return go to slowly erode every last portion of their dignity.

This man is the male equivalent of a slut, because much like promiscuous women lower the price of sex, a sexless yet committed man lowers the price of commitment.

19.) The Wall: Men Appreciate, Women Depreciate:

Women are depreciating assets, their major asset and unique selling point is their sexual beauty and fertility. Most squander their prime engaging in casual sex with strange men met in recurring dazes of substance-fuelled hedonism. This is what passes for female empowerment.

Thinking the party will never end, such women spend the bulk of their twenties being generally infantile, loutish and irresponsible, believing they have all the time in the world “to settle down.”

Then circa age thirty a strange thing happens, a woman’s looks begin to noticeably decline, every wrinkle eroding the allure and power she is accustomed to. This is only exacerbated by years of debauchery and substance abuse, and so typically lacking in any culinary ability the modern woman is prone to premature ageing.

It is only with this erosion of power in a woman’s life that a shift in priorities takes hold, such women scramble in desperation to find a man to settle down with, often settling for men they would not give a look but a few short years before.

Men on the other hand are beginning to acquire more power than they had in their twenties around this age, becoming even more attractive to women. A woman burns brightly in youth but extinguishes quickly with age, time is much kinder to men, permitting them to age more like wine than milk. This is why it is taboo to ask a woman her age, whilst men bear no such sensitivity over the issue.

20.) Men Are Made, Women Are Born

Women are born, a woman is just a girl that can conceive children. There is no challenge mental, spiritual or otherwise that distinguishes a girl from a woman, nothing other than age even attempts to make this distinction. And thus it is so that whilst we hear chatter of what constitutes manliness, that a hated man is a boy whilst an admired man is “a real man”, we hear no such rhetoric in regards to women.

Unlike womanhood, there are barriers to manhood which transcend age and they embody qualities and characteristics which men as a collective respect and aspire to. Things like fearlessness, confidence, bravery, strength and honour. Unlike women, men are not born, they are created. Pain, poverty, difficulty and heartache, these are the things that make men out of boys.

Conflict and pain is what forges the masculine mindset, a boy cannot grow into a man without conflict and retrospectively analysing his mistakes. A man is the embodiment of experience and difficulty, comfort but the entropy of a boy’s most visceral pursuit to develop his masculinity.

Men need to apply logic to the pain endured in their lives in order to become powerful enough to transcend boyhood. Men are not born because comfort doesn’t breed men, men are bred in the fields of bloody battle, be it a war of economy, psychology, violence, or a combination of such.

A man is a soldier of differing kinds, an individual that has learnt to repress fear and hone the adrenaline it elicits to attack his limitations and evolve. This is the spirit of “manning up”, all this the process necessary to become someone worthy of the mighty majesty the word “man” represents.

21.) Single Mothers Breed Weak Men:

Single mothers are ill-equipped to breed men, and overwhelmingly lack the tools necessary to give a boy the guidance he needs to reach a higher stage of male development. Boys don’t meet their potential, they are poorly disciplined and have little sense of purpose or life direction. Poor discipline breeds low confidence and passivity, qualities which are inherently anti-charismatic in nature and hence deleterious to a man’s romantic chances.

[Read more on this topic here.]

22.) The Importance of Social Market Value:

Social market value is everything, something a low-value man says deemed “creepy” is “flirty” or “sexy” when spoken by a high value man. A man must as such focus on maintaining his physical appearance to the highest possible standard. This will make his life easier in areas not just confined to sexuality, but likewise in the social and financial. The better looking one is, the more positively they are perceived. This bias for the attractive we all instinctively share is described by a phenomenon known as the halo effect.

23.) Testosterone & Health:

Your diet and exercise place a certain handicap on your ability to fully utilise your potential. The obese, ill-rested and ill-nourished are typically low in energy and thus highly unproductive. Such people are not in a mental state conducive to achievement for they are ruled by lethargy.

Procrastination is the slow-acting poison of an individual living a sedentary life. Physically active people get things done. Exercise is not only invigorating itself, but it will give you the energy to get everything else done. As such, regular physical activity and good diet are necessary rather than optional.

Maintain high natural testosterone levels by consuming saturated fat and getting eight hours of uninterrupted sleep nightly. Train by performing heavy compound lifts, the squat, deadlift and bench press at least three times a week. Give yourself a recovery day between every training session. If you need help as a beginner, Mark Rippetoe’s book “Starting Strength” is a popular introduction to weightlifting.

A man must take care of his body in order to potentiate his mind, higher testosterone will enhance cognition, increase confidence and increase energy levels.

24.) The Feminisation of Education:

The modern educational environment is a bastion of socially engineered progressivism hostile to boys and young men. Women outnumber men in teaching positions and have a stronger presence within institutions of higher learning. Collectively, the sexist attitudes of female faculty and students within the educational establishment drive young torrents of young men away from higher learning.

And can we really blame young men from opting out of a race with odds that are insurmountably stacked against them? Of course not! The political correctness that inevitably goes hand in hand with feminism is enough to disenchant, demotivate and emasculate any hopeful, vibrant young man. Modern academia is simply not an environment that is conducive to the spiritual well-being of men, progressive social engineering is deleterious to the modern man’s mental health.

If you’re male, in education and you find the whole ordeal to be taxing on your soul, it’s time to consider learning a trade or skill that will allow you to freelance or start your own business. Financial freedom not only teaches confidence, but it allows a man to escape the henpecking pervasive amongst the politically correct culture of the corporate world. In industries where extreme talent or risk are necessary, such as engineering or construction, women are scarce in number and so refuge from misandry can likewise be found there.

Many trades are male dominated (such as mechanics, electricians, plumbers) so these fields are great areas to go into if you want to avoid negative female influences in the workplace. Financial independence is a signature requirement of becoming a fully actualised man; men who undertake entrepreneurship or work in male dominated fields need not repress their masculinity in fear they may lose their job for simply behaving masculine.

25.) Why Women Covet Male Friendship:

Women want male friends because they’re better company. More interesting, more entertaining, less crazy, less annoying – all of that good stuff. Likewise they know if they’re pretty they can leverage that into favour whilst giving you nothing, so this is the scam most even moderately pretty women are working.

Men want to be friends with women because they are stupid and think friendship is the first stepping stone to sex. Women profit from this false belief because men waste time, passion and energy on an endeavour which eventually yields nothing but but hassle in return. When a man figures out friendship is not the path to sex with women, he ceases to see the point in having female friends.

Even though a man’s friendship is worth more than a woman’s, women won’t trade sex for it because being likeable doesn’t make you fuckable. Women have the opposite problem, they are fuckable rather than likeable. Men have to work to be fuckable, women have to work to be likeable.

But a woman is only concerned with her own needs, not yours. Just like men will gladly use a women up sexually, a woman will gladly use up a man emotionally and financially. A woman is all too happy to devour your time and use you as a source of entertainment and conduit for complaining all the while she gives you nothing in return. This is a bad deal for a man because his company is infinitely higher quality, and thus more valuable than hers. In 99% of cases this means if you’re hanging out with a woman you’re not fucking, you’re getting a bad deal.

Legitimate female friends, women you find unattractive and are interesting are rare, because most women have no personality. Their personality basic, based on gossip. This is most women; the epitome of boring. Most women never become more than their sexuality because they don’t need to evolve beyond that to be successful. This is why the vast majority of women make no effort to be funny or interesting. That’s just the way it is. If you want quality friendship, you look for it among men.

If you are ever in a situation where you’re stuck with women and bored out of your mind (you will be) the best way to make things interesting is to mock them. The only way women become interesting is if you tease them, call them out and be generally combative. Otherwise you’ll be bored, asking yourself why you’re with a gaggle of women when you’d have more fun reading the world’s least interesting book.